Resistance 2
Mirror's Edge
Quantum of Solace
I was 'lucky' enough to borrow this off a mate. It's basically the Call of Duty engine mixed with both the last two Bond films (Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace). It's also a mix of First Person shooting and Third Person cover style shooting. In fact the camera zooms out all the time so you can see Daniel 'Mr Poatato Head' Craig doing his thing. It's not quite as slick as Gears of War but it's not far off and works solidly. There's also the chance to do some brutal physical damage up close.
Unlike most FPS's you'll get nowhere running and gunning. It's a tatical shooter and the controls mostly let you duck from cover to cover and pick off the bad guys.
The crux of the matter is do you feel like Bond? And, rather inevitably, the answer is yes and no. There are moments when you feel like a super spy and there's moments when you feel like there's rather too much Call of Duty and not enough on Her Majesty Secret Service.
Overall I enjoyed most of it. There's some good hacking and spying touches (there's a neat little keypad hacking minigame that's sadly let down by the 360's fisher price D-pad that can't always register the difference between the four basic directions). There's also some brilliant set pieces and chunky weapons.
Showing posts with label Casino Royale. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Casino Royale. Show all posts
Wednesday, 21 January 2009
Tuesday, 4 November 2008
Quantum of Solace
While Casino Royale may not have been a perfect film it certainly took the Bond franchise back in the right direction with a more modern gritty feel and much toned down on the over the top gadgets and villans. Certainly it leaves Quantum of Solace with a lot to live up to.
The film continues straight on from Casino Royale and assumes you have a decent working knowledge of its plot. There's some great action set pieces and Craig gets the brutal, cold part of Bond just right. The film lacks some of the humour that has been a Bond trade mark but given the films theme of revenge this is probably acceptable (although I'd like to see it make a come back for tne next film).
The films main problems stem from the direction and editing which is a bit on the busy side for my liking. Cutting and changing every few seconds may be acceptable in a pop video but here it makes it difficult to really see what's going on. One particular on foot scene is inter cut with a horse race and gets particularly annoying. It's tiring over the films run time. It also borrows a bit too heavily from the last Bourne film too. A couple of sequences seem to have almost been lifted completely. Oh, and the Villan is a bit dull too (Certainly his henchmans haircut makes him look a bit too 'special needs' to be convincing).
Having said all that it's still a good film. The pacing is better than Casino Royale and the relationship between M and Bond is very convincing. I thoroughly enjoyed it even if it'll take a repeat viewing to understand exactly what was going on (whether it was our local cinema or the sound mix but some bits of dialogue where lost in the action). A worthy follow up to Casino Royale but next time the producers will want to establish their own identity a bit more.
The film continues straight on from Casino Royale and assumes you have a decent working knowledge of its plot. There's some great action set pieces and Craig gets the brutal, cold part of Bond just right. The film lacks some of the humour that has been a Bond trade mark but given the films theme of revenge this is probably acceptable (although I'd like to see it make a come back for tne next film).
The films main problems stem from the direction and editing which is a bit on the busy side for my liking. Cutting and changing every few seconds may be acceptable in a pop video but here it makes it difficult to really see what's going on. One particular on foot scene is inter cut with a horse race and gets particularly annoying. It's tiring over the films run time. It also borrows a bit too heavily from the last Bourne film too. A couple of sequences seem to have almost been lifted completely. Oh, and the Villan is a bit dull too (Certainly his henchmans haircut makes him look a bit too 'special needs' to be convincing).
Having said all that it's still a good film. The pacing is better than Casino Royale and the relationship between M and Bond is very convincing. I thoroughly enjoyed it even if it'll take a repeat viewing to understand exactly what was going on (whether it was our local cinema or the sound mix but some bits of dialogue where lost in the action). A worthy follow up to Casino Royale but next time the producers will want to establish their own identity a bit more.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)